Posted by: gcarkner | September 29, 2012

Scientism Investigation continued…4

Scientism Entails Logical Problems as noted by Philosophers

This is the fourth instalment on the ideology of scientism as we bring it to the bar of academic scrutiny:

Scientism as a philosophical claim of knowledge monopoly becomes shipwrecked on its own rocks, so to speak. The key claim of empiricism or positivism (that only what is empirically testable is true) cannot be justified empirically. The argument lacks substance, and appears self-contradictory. Famous positivist A. J. Ayer himself eventually admitted that his system was bankrupt. The claim that only factual statements have validity is itself non-factual, speculative, even closed-minded. Let me explain. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 26, 2012

A Wager on Transcendence

Graduate Identity: a Wager on Transcendence

This idea emerges out of George Steiner in his important book Real Presences and Charles Taylor in his tome  Sources of the Self. We turn to the Arts for this portion of the postgraduate identity discourse. We agree that it is folly to try to prove absolutely the divine from the material stuff of the world, but it does not mean that there is no evidence or good reason to believe in the supernatural. We need not stifle the human imagination from the start. Charles Taylor in A Secular Age (p. 543) notes in his chapter titled “The Immanent Frame” that “we have come to understand our lives as taking place within a self-sufficient, immanent order, a constellation of orders, cosmic, social and moral…. This immanent order can tend to slough off the transcendent.” It can spin into a Closed World Structure (exclusive humanism), which hermeneutically refuses evidence of the divine; it can hold our minds captive in a way that makes atheism seem obvious. He notes that we early twenty-first century moderns tend to focus exclusively on human flourishing or self-fulfilment as our ultimate goal.

But Steiner carefully rebuts this outlook in his wager on transcendence; he claims that we need the transcendent to make sense of ‘otherness’ in the Arts (an element that is beyond the full control of the artist, but recognized by most artists and art appreciators). In a kind of aesthetic imaginative exercise, he appeals to convictions that are beyond typical rational verification or scientific falsification: “There is an art-act and its reception. There is in the experience of meaningful form, a presence. There is an irreducible autonomy of presence, of ‘otherness’, in art and text which denies either adequate paraphrase or unanimity of finding” (Real Presences, p. 213). He appeals to human intuition and common perception. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 24, 2012

Scientism Investigation continued…3

Part 3. Scientism is not honest about the methodological limitations of science

Let us extend the point in Part 2 of our scientism critical investigation. We must look briefly at science’s own self-limitations. Science or natural philosophy has its own integrity when it does not exceed its proper limits and seek to police the other questions we are allowed to ask, or invade illegitimately the territory of other disciplines. In general, science is appropriate to the study of cause-effect relationships at the physical level of being (efficient causes), but not appropriate to adjudicate questions of purpose, meaning or worldview (final causes). The following important limitations ensue. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 24, 2012

Prayer of a Curious Skeptic

Dear God, Buddha, Allah, Confucius, Plato, Krishna, Beings from other planets, Jesus, the Universe, Etc. Is anyone out there? Do you care? Can’t you have a meeting and send us one rep? This pluralism is really confusing.

OK, right, this is awkward. I don’t really believe in you anymore. I’m kind of still angry with my  father who dragged me to church and forced religion on our family. It’s just not cool with my friends you know to think or talk about spiritual things; they are all agnostics or atheists, singing the praises of Richard Dawkins or A.C. Grayling. They are big on science and extreme sports as the way to go. Is that faith?

One of my social science profs is keen on Nietzsche, will to power, self-assertion therapy. He also likes Foucault’s idea of self-invention. Is  Foucault a neo-Nietzschean? I’m concerned about my career big time–medicine I am hoping. At university, there is a litany of complaints about religion, every day. Perhaps you should send an envoy to address some of them? Science & Religion seem like oil and water or worse. Faith seems like wishful thinking or pure emotion, something for weaklings, an escape from reality. Be realistic they tell us. Be rational.

But just in the outside chance that you, whoever you are, wherever you are, whatever you are, are real and that my fellow agnostics, skeptics and atheists are a bit overconfident, I have some questions that I’ve wanted to ask. I heard of Justin Barrett, a cognitive psychologist from California, who claims that 90% of people around the world believe in some kind of supernatural being or ground of existence. He says believing in God comes naturally to us, that we are hard wired for religion. I have a lot of doubts, and I still have this hangup with my Dad.

Why are you so hidden if you run the universe? You have a very low profile for being so omniscient and omnipresent. A spot on CNN maybe to update humanity? At least a Facebook or Twitter account, I suggest.

What’s the deal with the terrible violence, human suffering and injustice? This is very disturbing. I just hate it. Can’t something be done to stop it? Do you care?

What is love anyway? I don’t get it. Frustrating, illusive stuff. Aren’t people just out to manipulate one another for their own interest? How do I sort out reality from fantasy here? Is it more than sex or an emotional high? My last boyfriend hurt me so much. It knocked me down for months.

I sense the need for more substantial meaning but I am afraid of looking the fool, hoping for too much and being disappointed. Partying is not doing it for me anymore. I’m so damn lonely. I really wonder if there is really anyone I can trust, even my friends. They are often manipulative and exploitive.

Things are so complex. Is there a formula for happiness I’m not getting? Does Brené Brown have the answer in her vulnerability discourse? Sometimes I think life, academics, parents, others expect too much of me. I feel guilty all the time in trying to meet others expectations. The stress is not fair!

So many worldviews on offer; so many games in town. How do I choose? How do I know what’s true and bogus, aside from all the shouting, the rituals, images and outfits?

It is an awesome universe and nature is fantastic; hiking, biking and skiing gets me high and feeling good, above my problems.  I am inspired by the beauty of these mountains and the vastness of the ocean, the size of the cosmos, the mystery of the early morning fog. That’s something that speaks to me. Are you in the fog?

I’m trying to be honest with myself, but it is really hard. Is it all just a game we play until we die, this search for self, identity and meaning? How do I get above my basic desires and fears, all this anger inside me? Are we humans any different than other animals? University seems so full of paradoxes and irony. Smart people do some really dumb things.

Morality confuses me, but I sense there is something to it, living for some good cause or some ideal, save the planet, feed the poor, cure a disease, help the refugees. I don’t like it when people cheat or lie to me. There have to be some trusted parameters for human relations.

I sense I need something to believe in more than work and romance, a source of inspiration beyond survival, paying bills, a mortgage. Is there an article or book I can read to sort this out? A class maybe? A brilliant person to mentor?

Please respond….Sarah <@sar_ah>

Posted by: gcarkner | September 23, 2012

Portrait of a Top History Scholar

MARK A. NOLL

History Department, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (574/631-7574); mnoll@nd.edu

EDUCATION B.A. (English), Wheaton College (IL), 1968 Summer Study (German) Middlebury College, 1968 M.A. (Comparative Literature), University of Iowa, 1970 (Thesis: “Novalis: Literary Relations and an Experiment in Translation”) M.A. (History of Christianity), Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 1972 (Thesis: “Melchior Hofmann and the Lutherans”) M.A., Ph.D. (History of Christianity), Vanderbilt University, 1974, 1975

(Dissertation: “Church Membership and the American Revolution: An Aspect of Religion and Society from the Great Awakening to the War for Independence”) Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 22, 2012

Regent Bookstore Mini-Tour

Regent Bookstore Tour: Apologetics Gold

UBC has a great bookstore as most students know, but Regent Bookstore, within Regent College, right at Gate One (Wesbrook Mall @ University Boulevard) is a not-to-be-missed intellectual goldmine on campus. I believe that it is one of the most comprehensive theological, faith and culture bookstores in Canada. They have so much good literature here. You simply have to check it out personally; I assure that you will not regret it.

*********************

The Carkner Tour: This week, I want to take you on a mini-tour of the Apologetics Section of the store. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 20, 2012

Are Christians Irrelevant to Society?

Are Christians other-worldly and irrelevant to life in this century?

That depends on one’s perspective. This accusation often rings true. Many Christians certainly seem other-worldly and even possibly irrelevant; many hide their head in the sand and wish for a quick end of the world. Where’s the courage, hope and compassion in that? But this does not reflect the main emphasis of the Bible, within which Christian teaching is located and inspired. Far from being other-worldly, biblical Christianity emphasizes the importance of this world in three major ways. Read More…

The Creative Challenge of Christian Humanism for Western Culture

Wednesday, February 23, 2012

Abstract

The question of who ‘we’ are and what vision of humanity ‘we’ assume in Western culture lies at the heart of hotly debated questions on the role of religion in education, politics, and culture in general. The need for recovering a greater purpose for social practices is indicated, for example, by the rapidly increasing number of publications on the demise of higher education, lamenting the fragmentation of knowledge and university culture’s surrender to market-driven pragmatism. The West’s cultural rootlessness and lack of cultural identity are also revealed by the failure of multiculturalism to integrate religiously vibrant immigrant cultures. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 20, 2012

Ian Hutchinson, MIT Plasma Physicist

 

Monopolizing Knowledge: Scientism’s Inconsistent Rejection of Faith.

Wednesday, January 23, 4:00 pm

The widespread error of scientism—the belief that science is all 
the real knowledge that exists—is responsible for much of the modern 
suspicion of science; and it underlies the militant atheist arguments
 against religion.  MIT professor, Ian Hutchinson, shows how scientism 
is an impoverished view of knowledge and the primary cause of the 
culture wars.  Rejecting scientism enables a principled intellectual
 reconciliation of science with religious faith, and with other 
academic disciplines. Read More…

Posted by: gcarkner | September 18, 2012

Scientism Investigation Part 2

Scientism Under the Microscope

Screen Shot 2016-07-17 at 9.08.58 PM

Science by any measure is impressive in its proven and disciplined methods, its growth of findings. Despite popular belief, the integrity of scientism, on the other hand, is very shaky; most scientists do not share its arrogance. It is still, however, a strong influence within the Western cultural ethos. But scientism does not square with established science. Rather, it involves a perversion of the principles  and methodology of science; this  confusion needs to be clarified. This is part three of my blog on scientism, an ongoing series.

Point 2.  Scientism Actually Perverts the Core Principles of Science: A reductionist epistemology morphs into a reductive ontology.

a. The empirical principle or test for scientific theories turns into exclusivistic empiricism under the influence of the ideology of scientism: this is the conviction that any belief must be scientifically testable and controllable to gain credibility or have merit.  There are many beliefs and assumptions required by science itself which do not pass the empirical test. Thus, exclusivistic empiricism is a self-defeating, unsustainable position. Further science doesn’t address some of the most important human questions: e.g. morals, political rights, meaning and religion. This reveals a problem of intellectual hegemony. Read More…

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories